Gain insights on modifiers 51, 59, and X modifiers. Definitions, how-to- and guidelines from CMS, AMA, and PCG Software's Virtual AuthTech and iVECoder, and other reputable online coding websites. All data retrieved is relevant as of December 5, 2022.
Modifier Procedures: When multiple procedures, other than E/M services, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation services, or provision of supplies (eg, vaccines), are performed at the same session by the same individual, the primary procedure or service may be reported as listed. The additional procedure(s) or service(s) may be identified by appending modifier 51 to the additional procedure or service code(s). Note: This modifier should not be appended to designated "add-on" codes (see Appendix D).
The surgeon performs close treatment of humeral shaft fracture; without manipulation (24500). This is a fracture of the humerus (Upper Arm) and Elbow and falls under the musculoskeletal system. You’ve probably billed this hundred if not thousands of times, right? But what happens if you find during surgery that the patient has a clavicle fracture too? What do you fill for? You would bill 24500 regularly, then apply multiple procedures reduction code (modifier 51) to 23500 as 23500-51.
Sources: PCG’s iVECoder software, PCG’s Virtual AuthTech, and outside source
link
On January 1, 2015, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Service (CMS) introduced 4 Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System modifiers, known collectively as the – X(EPSU) modifiers, as a subset of Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) modifier 59 (distinct procedural service).
Modifier 59 is the most commonly used and abused modifier for Medicare reimbursement of CPT codes in acupuncture, breast biopsies, physical therapy, radiology, surgery, and other medical practices. It often causes incorrect payments, triggering audits, fraud, waste, and abuse (FWA) cases, and escalating costs for everyone.
The 2013 Comprehensive Error Rate Testing reports $2.4 billion was paid on claims containing modifier 59 with a projected error rate of $450 million. While modifier 59 is not the sole culprit, if it caused 10% of the errors it would represent $45 million in damages.
Modifiers XE (separate encounter), XP (separate practitioner), XS (separate structure), and XU (unusual non-overlapping service) are to be used, together with National Correct Coding Initiative (NCCI) edits, to identify distinct services in the same encounter warranting separate reimbursement.
While it encourages migration to the new modifiers, CMS currently allows providers to submit either modifier 59 or the appropriate X modifier to override Correct Coding Initiative (CCI) edits and get paid. The new codes were designed to be more descriptive, provide more precise coding options, reduce errors, improve claims processing, make payments more accurate, reduce FWA and save money. But, because CMS has not issued clear guidance to use the new modifiers, as promised, the change, instead of improving the situation, has exacerbated it. This has caused denied claims, frustrated workers, and increased costs even more.
Distinct Procedural Service: Under certain circumstances, it may be necessary to indicate that a procedure or service was distinct or independent from other non-E/M services performed on the same day. Modifier 59 is used to identify procedures/services, other than E/M services, that are not normally reported together but are appropriate under the circumstances. Documentation must support a different session, different procedure or surgery, different site or organ system, separate incision/excision, separate lesion, or separate injury (or area of injury in extensive injuries) not ordinarily encountered or performed on the same day by the same individual. However, when another already established modifier is appropriate it should be used rather than modifier 59. Only if no more descriptive modifier is available, and the use of modifier 59 best explains the circumstances, should modifier 59 be used. Note: Modifier 59 should not be appended to an E/M service. To report a separate and distinct E/M service with a non-E/M service performed on the same date, see modifier 25.
A physician uses a tangential biopsy of skin, CPT 11102 (e.g. shave, scoop, saucerize, current); single lesion of skin growth, first growth. However, the dermatologist also performs destruction (e.g. laser surgery) on premalignant lesions as well (precancer skin growth) What do you bill?
In this example just consider it one surgery billed under time versus another surgery billed under time. If they are done on different anatomic sites on the same side of the body use modifier 59. If they are different sides of the body you want to use RT and LT modifiers.
How do you bill a stress test and ECG on the same day but at different times? Your billing should look like this; CPT Code 93015 cardiovascular stress test, CPT 93040-59; Rhythm ECG. If you conduct them at the same time, you would bill them regularly as 93015, and 93040.
New material in the National Correct Coding Initiative (CCI) Policy Manual helps clarify hand and foot procedures billed by physicians and podiatrists. We have received frequent questions about the CCI edits in the skin and integumentary systems. The CCI Column 1 and Column 2 edit bundles 11055 (pairing or cutting of benign hyperkeratotic lesion) with 11720 (debridement of the nail(s) by any method; 1-5 nails). Hyperkeratotic lesions are undue thickening of the outer layer of the skin so that a dense horny layer, such as a corn or callosity results. If 11055 and 11720 are performed on the same toe or finger, the bundling edit applies. But if the procedures are performed. On separately identifiable digits, then an overriding modifier 59, or modifiers X (EPSU) can be used by the provider to report the separate site. Correct diagnosis coding will also assist in demonstrating separate sites.
Separate encounter, a service that is distinct because it occurred during a separate encounter
Another subset of Modifier 59, XE refers to two surgeries performed on the same anatomical part of the body such as rotator cuff repair (29827) and partial synovectomy (29820). If it’s the same shoulder toss out 59 and apply XE to 29820. An easy way to remember XE is X-tra entry.
Separate practitioner, a service that is distinct because it was performed by a different practitioner.
Modifier XP is a subset of Modifier 59 and can be used when a separate procedure was performed by a separate provider, preferably within the same specialty and legal organization. An easy way to remember this is XP could stand for X-tra provider and X-tra procedure.
A separate structure is a service that is distinct because it was performed on a separate organ/structure.
XS is yet again another subset of Modifier 59. Just think of it as two surgeries, two separate sites. It helps you bypass NCCI edits. One easy example of is two injections, one to the elbow (CPT 20550), and one to the tendon sheath of the knee (CPT 20550). You would bill that as CPT 20550 and CPT 20550-XS.
An unusual non-overlapping service is the use of a service that is distinct because it does not overlap the usual components of the main service. An easy way to remember Modifier XU is X-tra unusual.
Another subset of Modifier 59, XE refers to two surgeries performed on the same anatomical part of the body such as rotator cuff repair (29827) and partial synovectomy (29820). If it’s the same shoulder toss out 59 and apply XE to 29820. An easy way to remember XE is X-tra entry.
Understanding when to use modifier 59 versus modifier 51 is relatively simple. Modifier 51 is used when an additional surgery performed on the same day is more commonly expected. Both modifiers should not be applied to an E/M service. While modifier 51 impacts the payment amount, modifier 59 will affect if your clinic is to be paid at all or if you as a Health should approve and reimburse at all. A general rule of thumb for modifier 59 is that you should look at another modifier first, never apply modifier 59 as a one size fits all billing solution.
You should have appropriate AI coding software to help evaluate and take into consideration the RVU (relative value units) of the CPTs in order to bill effectively for modifier 51 and modifier 59.
If you need help with medical codes, PCG has amazing software solutions for providers, health plans, IPAs, MSOs, and TPAs; iVECoder for Clinics, and Virtual AuthTech for Payers. The definitions, reason codes, and all relevant data we’ve provided in this Blog could be at your fingertips.
For over 30 years, PCG Software Inc. has been a leader in AI-powered medical coding solutions, helping Health Plans, MSOs, IPAs, TPAs, and Health Systems save millions annually by reducing costs, fraud, waste, abuse, and improving claims and compliance department efficiencies. Our innovative software solutions include Virtual Examiner® for Payers, VEWS™ for Payers and Billing Software integrations, and iVECoder® for clinics.
Support Request
New Customer Quick Links
All Rights Reserved | PCG Software, Inc.
Website Created & Managed by Talents Into Profits